After all the Raw mosaic extraction is done with this lib. >Could it be an issue of the raw handler that is used? What is the big difference between Rawtherapee and digikam in >this sense? Thinking into a different direction: could it be that Rawtherapee demosaics the file before displaying it?ġ/ In libraw. Looking with diff, they are >hugely different.Ģ file format different, so 2 ouput differents. >I had a look with exiftool the output for an original S3Pro raw file and the converted DNG. You must test with this version which is the current development stage. No, digiKam appImage 7.0.0-beta3 use the lasted libraw version (beta not yet released). >Manually upgrading to current exiv2 0.27.2, brings no change in reading the metadata. As digikam appimage has all built in, that is irrelevant. >As an aside Ubuntu 18.04 has LibRaw 0.19.5 in the repository. Not he best way.Īnd RawTherapee use also a dedicated Raw engine. In this case we need to use a the closed source RAW to DNG converter. They even >more suggest going to DNG via Adobe DNG converter ( ) >Rawtherapee has no issues whatsoever with my DNG files (about 2700). Yes, darktable has own implementation of Raw demosaicing >I am unsure which raw lib they actually use at this time in the above link it reads "darktable doesn’t use dcraw/libraw >and more." Including Darktable that clearly suggests to use >DNG files. >Where does this leave us? So various apps "have issues" with raw files. What relevance does exiv2 have for interpreting the raw/dng files? I'm trying to figure out where the glitch is most likely to be. Maik, you seem to hint that progress with exiv2 is "slowish". Unfortunately my coding days are long gone, so I'd be challenged to research into, how the "logic" works here. Looking with diff, they are hugely different.Ĭould it be an issue of the raw handler that is used? What is the big difference between Rawtherapee and digikam in this sense? Thinking into a different direction: could it be that Rawtherapee demosaics the file before displaying it? I had a look with exiftool the output for an original S3Pro raw file and the converted DNG. Manually upgrading to current exiv2 0.27.2, brings no change in reading the metadata. They even more suggest going to DNG via Adobe DNG converter ( )Īs an aside Ubuntu 18.04 has LibRaw 0.19.5 in the repository. Rawtherapee has no issues whatsoever with my DNG files (about 2700). I am unsure which raw lib they actually use at this time in the above link it reads "darktable doesn’t use dcraw/libraw and more." Including Darktable that clearly suggests to use DNG files. Where does this leave us? So various apps "have issues" with raw files.
0 kommentar(er)
